[MD] MOQ Recursion

[MarshaV]

On Aug 8, 2010, at 7:46 PM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote:

> 
> [Arlo]
> I am not the one confusing the Metaphysics of Quality with Quality itself, for
> that you need look no further than Bo. And YOU make this same confusion above.
> 
> To fix it, you should say... Its the way we first come to konw it; and, as
> we've all been saying in various ways again and again, the MOQ is an
> intellectual 'description' of Quality itself.
> 
> See? No confusion. The way you had written it, the "Metaphysics of Quality" is
> confused with "Quality" itself. As I said to both Marsha and Bo, you are
> confusing the undefined (Quality) with Pirsig's attempt at a definition (the
> Metaphysics of Quality). 


Marsha:
I might agree with you that it is all analogy, including every sentence you've 
written.  Not this, not that!!!   This makes it very easy to dismiss your rhetoric too.  







 
___