[MD] now it comes

[craigerb at comcast.net]

[Craig, previously]
> If we want to explain the Grand Canyon by the
> pattern of the Colorado River, that pattern has to
> be in Arizona, not you or I.
.
[Marsha]
> Wouldn't the Colorado River and Arizona be other 
> patterns of value that may have bits and pieces 
> that interconnect with the Grand Canyon?
> I don't see a problem.


Agreed. When you see it like that,
there is no problem.
 
[Marsha]
> In my understanding, patterns are ever-changing,
> interconnecting, relative and impermanent. 

.
Also agreed.

Craig