[MD] now it comes

[MarshaV]

On Aug 13, 2010, at 7:02 PM, craigerb at comcast.net wrote:

> 
> 
> [Craig, previously]
>> If we want to explain the Grand Canyon by the
>> pattern of the Colorado River, that pattern has to
>> be in Arizona, not you or I.
> .
> [Marsha]
>> Wouldn't the Colorado River and Arizona be other 
>> patterns of value that may have bits and pieces 
>> that interconnect with the Grand Canyon?
>> I don't see a problem.
> 
> 
> Agreed. When you see it like that,
> there is no problem.
> 
> [Marsha]
>> In my understanding, patterns are ever-changing,
>> interconnecting, relative and impermanent. 
> 
> .
> Also agreed.
> 
> Craig 


Hi Craig,

If I consider the Grand Canyon, all sorts of bits and 
pieces dance through my head.  I've been to the 
Grand Canyon and felt it vastness and its silence.
I have a visual sense of its shapes and color.  If I 
stay with it, pieces of the Grand Canyon Suite 
move through my mind on braying donkeys.  I can 
even remember, with a physical tingling, the 
adrenaline rush from being too close to the edge.
Yet these memories are just bits and pieces of all 
that might comprised of such a pattern.  It seems to 
me there is nothing finite about a pattern.  It is nothing 
as confining as a dictionary definition or a description 
in an encyclopedia.   For me it is a collection of 
habits, and bits and pieces of memory.   

Marsha 


 
___