[MD] Theocracy, Secularism, and Democracy

[Steven Peterson]

Hi Horse,

In fairness to Bo, I think it was in this case and often is the case
that some other forum member decides that a particular thread presents
an opportunity to demonstrate how ridiculous SOL is. Such people may
be equally at fault for hijacking threads and are equally responsible
to start a new thread when they wish to change the topic.

Thanks, for you intervention.

Best,
Steve






On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Horse <horse at darkstar.uk.net> wrote:
>  Oh, and before anyone starts giving me a hard time about the content below
> or playing silly mind games, this has all been covered before.
> It's not censorship and I, and just about everyone else on this list, have
> no fear about the SOL interpretation or anything to do with it.
> Apart from 4, possibly 5, list members, no-one on this mailing list is in
> the least bit interested in how the SOL relates to any aspect of the MoQ. So
> it is just good manners that Bo (and others) that want to interject with
> comments regarding SOL in a thread that has nothing to do with SOL should
> change the subject heading.
>
> Horse
>
> On 14/08/2010 20:02, Horse wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Steve
>>
>> Yes I agree with you that Bo should not hijack threads with his SOL
>> interpretation - it's very easy to start another thread and it would be
>> appreciated if you would do so. There is also this creeping in:
>>
>> On 14/08/2010 16:13, skutvik at online.no wrote:
>>>
>>> I knew Arlo or someone else from the orthodox school would zoom in
>>> on exactly that point. Like in the "intellect creating a social
>>> nightmare"
>>> where Pirsig saw the implications and hastily added "SOM-as-intellect"
>>> (which if replaced by the "socialist" MOQ would create peace and
>>> harmony)
>>
>> which I have asked Bo to keep out of discussions.
>>
>> Bo, as I've said in the past Pirsig does not support "SOM-as-Intellect" so
>> please do not start down this road again. I've noticed you making these type
>> of references in the recent past and thought we had agreed that you would
>> refrain from this.
>>
>> Horse
>>
>>
>> On 14/08/2010 16:53, Steven Peterson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Horse,
>>>
>>> I've made the request in the past that if people want to discuss SOL
>>> b.s. that they should at east start a new thread (preferably with some
>>> clear label like "SOLBS" so I and like-minded others know not to
>>> bother reading it) rather than hijacking another thread. If you see
>>> fit, I would appreciate it if you would lend your administrative
>>> weight to my request.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Steve
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
> deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
> — Frank Zappa
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>