[MD] Theocracy, Secularism, and Democracy

[MarshaV]

On Aug 15, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Krimel wrote:

>> [Marsha]
>> The evolution that the MoQ references is the evolution of 
>> static patterns of value.  If you do not understand this, its 
>> back to kindergarten for you ;-)   
>> 
>> [Krimel]
>> So you think that Chapter 11 isn't the result of Pirsig not know jack shit
>> about evolutionary theory? You think he was simply taking a well known
> term
>> and making up a completely new meaning for it? Interesting, that could
>> explain his use of Quality and Dynamic and Static and Value and who knows
>> what else as well.
>> 
>> Great insight!
> 
> [Marsha]
> Are you making fun of me???    
> 
> I will need to reread Chapter 11, but I think RMP took a high
> value intellectual pattern, one of the hightest, a pattern that is
> very credible - evolution - and adapted it for the MoQ.  I'll leave
> it at that. 
> 
> [Krimel]
> No, at all it's a brilliant analogy. Kind of like a farmer who a takes
> a bull and adapts it for the farm by turning it into a steer.


Marsha:
I just looked up the difference between a bull and a steer and I
now know you're mocking me.  I'll reread Chapter 11 anyway to
see if there is more I can moo at you.   
 
 
 
 
 
___