[MD] Hijacking threads
John Carl
ridgecoyote at gmail.com
Mon Aug 16 14:42:03 PDT 2010
It's a tricky thing, dave, when a subject comes up, you wanna respond,
regardless of the rules or what the threading says.
But I'm all in favor of more order and better thread maintenance. You
wouldn't think a guy like me who is all chaotic and "all over the place"
wouldn't place much emphasis on rules and structure, but the way it works
out in the real world is exactly the opposite.
I think the best policing, is the thread-starter who cares enough to send
gentle reminders, what this particular thread is about, and for most people,
that will suffice.
Admittedly Bo crops up in many disparate headings, because we're all
thinking about the issues he raises and how best to address or refute (or is
that reject?) them.
John
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:06 PM, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> If threads are hijacked then the people who actually want to discuss
> Pirsig's MOQ have to waste even more time working around Bo's SOL and such.
> I wish that whole crowd would just take it somewhere else.
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list