[MD] Unkludging the MoQ

[David Thomas]

On 8/17/10 1:03 AM, "craigerb at comcast.net" <craigerb at comcast.net> wrote:

> [David]
>> If you go to my original post on Thursday, August 12, 2010 4:05 PM the layout
>> is correct
>  
> The l/o is garbled in my view of the archives.
Don't know what to tell you it's the nature of mail servers to not do
graphics. Guess you could always go to the MoQ.org archives if it matters.
> [Craig]
>> I think the more interesting question is what level human language is on.
> 
> [David]
>> when we develop a time machine is when we will definitively
>> answer this question.
>  
> It's not clear what you mean, but it sounds like you take this to be
> an empirical question.  I don't think that was Pirsig's intention.
See my response to Magnus. It not an empirical question but a physical one.
> 
> [David]
>> I'm glad you're so sure about toolmaking [being on the biological level].
> 
> Agreed.

Reread the sentence that you added the brackets too above. I sure hope you
"agreed" because you are agreeing with yourself.

Dave