[MD] Unkludging the MoQ

David Thomas combinedefforts at earthlink.net
Tue Aug 17 10:54:00 PDT 2010


On 8/17/10 12:25 PM, "Magnus Berg" <McMagnus at home.se> wrote:

> On 2010-08-17 19:17, Arlo Bensinger wrote:
>> [Magnus]
>> Huh? What is digital about that? They didn't have any A/D converters for
>> one thing. Or did I miss a joke, again? :-P
>> 
>> [Arlo]
>> Maybe I read the wrong humor into it, but I read it as fingers are often
>> called "digits", and hence the shaping of pottery using one's fingers
>> makes it "digital".
> 
> LOL. Thanks! Both Craig and Arlo.
> 
Whew! I'm glad that is cleared up.

I was about to suggest that a way to test the theory would be to put a large
clay flower pot over your head and sing Madonna at the top of your lungs
while spinning slowly to the right. When done plug the pot into your
computer and down load your clay-rendition to I-tunes. To get the biggest
bang for your buck, videotape the whole performance for You Tube.
But as Craig pointed out it would only be digit-al if you actually threw the
pot on a wheel prior to your performance. But, I suspect that wet clay,
while messier, would actually give you better fidelity.

Watch out Vegas. ;-)

I forgot that puns don't translate into other languages very well.

Dave





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list