[MD] Wiki: Subject-object problem

[MarshaV]

What are you talking about?  This paper was not from 
Wikipedia.  




On Aug 18, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:

> And back to the topic, sadly ...
> 
> That page is as dubious as any Wikipedia page can be. (It has all the
> formal warning notices and editing history for all to see.)
> 
> As I keep saying, Wikipedia is useless as source of information on
> anything contentious.
> Dictionaries and encyclopaedias are by their nature conservative, and
> if they are not conservative, they are useless as dictionaries or
> encyclopaedias - therefore they are useless unless you are (a C)
> conservative QED.
> 
> Nice try though Marsha.
> Ian
> 
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Ian Glendinning
> <ian.glendinning at gmail.com> wrote:
>> BTW - just wanted to say - threads like this are the reason I stick
>> with MoQ-Discuss.
>> 
>> All four seasons in a single day ... all four humours in a single thread.
>> 
>> To quote Marsha (almost) "I get very excited when I see how well xxx
>> and yyy fit together and strengthen each other."
>> Onward and upward.
>> Thanks for making my day Marsha, Magnus ... and Horse of course.
>> Ian
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:57 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Magnus,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for reading it.  I get very excited when I see how well the MoQ and Buddhism fit together and strengthen each other.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___