[MD] Speed of Lighting, Roar of thunder...
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Sun Aug 22 02:15:45 PDT 2010
On Aug 22, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Magnus Berg wrote:
>
>>> Agreement! Thanks for not pulling out the SOM rabbit as many others do.
>>> Respect.
>>
>> Marsha:
>> SOM is a major issue within RMP's rhetoric; why should you want
>> to avoid it? Its subject/object orientation is in direct opposition to the
>> MoQ's value orientation. What could possibly be your objection?
>> That it is too difficult to confront? That it is too difficult to resolve?
>
> I would want to avoid it when it's not relevant, like in this case where Craig spotted a difference of opinion where SOM was not an issue, but many others just use it as the "usual suspect".
>
> Magnus
>
Marsha:
Patterns existing "outside our concepts of them" seems to make it a SOM issue,
but I could be wrong. Do patterns exist as independent entities?
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list