[MD] Social level for humans only

[MarshaV]

John,  

I'm not talking about what was said while quilting in a group, and I 
not talking about your psychological gender nonsense either.
I'm talking about the power men used through the Church of Religion 
and the Church of Reason to define woman, and their place within 
society.  Women were not even permitted to vote until the last 
century.  Women can project valuable and interesting ideas too if 
they were not for centuries prohibited from doing so on threat of 
death.

Your crack about 'neti, neti' is pure foolishness.  It represents more 
than you understand, but of course, I get only what you project a
woman might think.   Probed and understood?  Fuck probed and 
understood.  Probe and understand your own illusions instead 
of erecting a tower of babel.  
  

Marsha  
  
 
 


On Aug 23, 2010, at 2:49 PM, John Carl wrote:

> Marsha said,
> 
> 
>> Agree, but I don't know that women are privileged to be in the position to
>> intellectualize (define) what men are like.
> 
> 
> 
> From the dawn of time, women have sat in circles and done exactly that,
> Marsha.  And they probably get a lot closer to the truth of the matter than
> men would find comfortable.
> 
> While men, when they get together, freely admit they don't understand women.
> So undoubtedly there's differing approaches.
> 
> For one example, it seems that men try much harder to put themselves out
> there.  Men are outwardly projectionistic, thrusting their ideas and
> thoughts out at the world.  Whereas women seem to relish being inward and
> secretive and mysterious, going all "not this, not that" or "fuck your
> questions" to avoid being probed and understood.
> 
> Dan Bern's question, "do you like me, or are you ignoring me?" is a question
> that takes balls to ask.
> 
> Big balls.
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ5t2Qr0q80




 
___