[MD] Speed of Lighting, Roar of thunder...

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

Yes , sorry Magnus , i did some re-reading and you are wright, correct , i
can see now , it was however your end-sentence
that made me doubting your optics.
But it is fine-tuned now.


This was the sentence making me doubt
quote magnus.


[Magnus]
Does it still exist outside of our concepts of it? Or did it seize to
exist when we conceptualized it?-------see it?,..this was rather slippery.


2010/8/25 Magnus Berg <McMagnus at home.se>

>
> Adrie
>
> "ADRIE KINTZIGER" <parser666 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >hi guys, Magnus , Krimel,
> >
> >Gravity was always present in the universe , it only became existing by
> >observing it , the set was complete.
> >
> >differentiation; differentiate existence from ,....was present before
> >existence.
> >Pirsig himself is pointing out towards this line of thinking in an
> interview
> >somewhere, when he is asked the question
> >did'n gravity exist before Newton? wat was the apple doing then before
> >Newton,; Pirsig answers , "it just felt"
> >IMPLICATING that gravity was present before Newton, before it was
> >formulated.
> >It was just there, outside of recognizible existence.
>
> But that's exactly what I'm saying when I say that the inorganic pattern
> "gravity" was present before Newton formulated the intellectual pattern
> "theory of gravity". The only difference is that I use terms defined by the
> MoQ, and isn't that what we should be doing here?
>
>    Magnus
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser