[MD] Theocracy, Secularism, and Democracy

[plattholden at gmail.com]

On 26 Aug 2010 at 20:35, John Carl wrote:

Platt and Arlo,

It occurred to me when Arlo refuted "reason" as subjective, earlier, that
maybe Platt could have used "reasonings" instead.  Thus signifying what I
think he meant with his repeated query - "whose reason?".

Thus instead,  "whose reasonings are we going to rely upon"?  When we agree
that  reason should be our guide, we mean men and women  working out the
best reasonings they can articulate, and deciding thusly.

[Platt]
Yes, that helps clarify what I meant. Thanks, John.