[MD] Social level for humans only
Krimel
Krimel at Krimel.com
Sat Aug 28 11:57:56 PDT 2010
Krimel said:
Truth is I didn't get much farther than the first few sentence[s]... There
is really no need to go on. Almost all of the ranting a raving that goes one
about this, especially from you, dmb, Ham and the like is ranting about the
Newtonian world view. ... Personally I don't think a retreat into
superstition, animism, panpsychic supernaturalism is the road out of the
mess.
dmb says:
Jumping to a dismissal after the first few sentences is a pretty good
indication of your open-mindedness, or rather your lack thereof. Not only
that, last week Chalmers was the hero of consciousness studies but this week
he is on a par with Ham and Platt. Well, at least you are consistent when it
comes to the production of straw men and other transparent bullshit. Let me
know how that works out for you at school, eh?
[Krimel]
You are the one who suggested an actual attempt to address issues. You are
the one who whined like a little bitch that I was being mean to you. Yet you
are the one who continues avoid issues. You are the one spewing pointless
analyses of style and speculating on personal motivations and character
flaws.
You are the one besmirching the good name of Robert Pirsig and his
philosophy by connecting it to spiritualism, dualism and the supernatural
disguised as esoteric new age romanticism.
I have tried to heed your call as best I am able but it is difficult when
you avoid the substance of what I have said and focus on trivialities like
this. I implore you to heed your own advise and stick to the issues. Because
if the past is any guide, you are not very good at this name calling crap,
and if you continue I will wind up reflexively resorting to sarcasm and you
will be back to whimpering in the corner sobbing about being mistreated and
begging me to stop.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list