[MD] Able to change well.

Sat Aug 28 19:31:07 PDT 2010

I will always be here for you, Ade. ( sniffle )

Now consider what I say:

Don't be fooled by fancy talk.

There are only patterns.

Stable patterns and self-contradicting patterns. Neither is more or less a 
pattern than the other.

"Dynamic Quality" is a pattern.

The Unpatterned is not open to you.

________________________________
From: "schoadabyool at talktalk.net" <schoadabyool at talktalk.net>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Sat, August 28, 2010 4:02:24 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Able to change well.

Hello Frank,
i appreciate your sense of humour.
Thanks
Ade

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Booth <frankbooth66 at yahoo.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 1:43
Subject: Re: [MD] Able to change well.

[Grasshopper]
My question is how can patterns be stable and yet migrate toward Dynamic Quality 

at the same time?

<Master Frank>
The man of the spirit knows that "stable" and "migrating towards Dynamic 
quality" are both patterns. No contradiction Grasshopper.

[Grasshopper]
Some patterns seem to be too latched and stable and can not change. So they are 
bad at being able to change.
And yet others must be good at being able to change so they can migrate toward 
Dynamic Quality as Robert Pirsig says in Lila.
How is this possible?

<Master Frank>
It puts the lotion on it's skin or else it reads the book again. It does this 
when it's told, grasshopper.

[Grasshopper]
Is this a new question or does Robert Pirsig give an answer somewhere?

<Master Frank>
Yes he does and it's in Swahili now put the fucking lotion in the basket!

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html