[MD] Inorganic: dynamic or static?

[Magnus Berg]

Andy

On 2010-08-29 04:37, Andy Skelton wrote:
>> [Andy]
>> Setting aside the levels above the inorganic, is there anything new
>> under the sun?
>>
>> [Krimel]
>> The Bose-Einstein condensate?
>
> The discovery by humans of previously unknown configurations of matter
> is not evidence of any dynamic thrust of the inorganic level.
>
> I don't want to get back into the distinction between gravitation and
> the law of gravity, please.

Not sure why we would get there. BEC is just one quantum level law that 
sometimes get through the inorganic level. Some even suggests it's the 
physical basis for conciousness in living brains, see "The Quantum Self".

So, to complete the stack, I think you need quantum laws beneath the 
inorganic ones you have, plus chemical laws on top. If you treat those 
as separate levels or not is perhaps not important. (Although the higher 
laws should actually be just consequences of lower.)

Let me know if you want to distribute it to more CPUs.

	Magnus