[MD] Inorganic: dynamic or static?

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

Try c/p violation Andy as a search term
'im still struggling with the module of Chaitin,but i think i can see
something emerging, do you think the
module will lead me to the conclusion , that the intellectual level is
thinking on itself?, but its only dawning so far.
greetzz,Adrie


2010/8/28 Andy Skelton <skeltoac at gmail.com>

> I wish to write a binary logic stack. In my current plans, some of the
> first modules will define inorganic patterns of value. I am trying to
> work out whether the laws that govern the procession of the inorganic
> level should be arbitrary and static, or whether they should have a
> dynamic thrust.
>
> Is there any dynamic thrust at the inorganic level?
>
> Solar nuclear fusion seems to be converting matter into more complex
> patterns according to static templates.
>
> Gravitation seems to be aggregating matter into more complex masses
> according to a static law.
>
> Setting aside the levels above the inorganic, is there anything new
> under the sun?
>
> Andy
>
> p.s. Q is not a module.
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser