[MD] atomic preferences and panexperientialism (panpyschism)

ADRIE KINTZIGER parser666 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 30 12:23:15 PDT 2010


Well, Dave, as i was reading the line of thinking in the postings; the word
selective reductionism popped up in my head.
Not that it is of any importance. But selective reductionism  used
incorrectly or improperly  is a potential widget capable of
preventing the opening of  pandora's box called panpsychism, opening the
field, the terra incognita--;the road ahaed of us.
I think the message is , -expanding the field.

Had nothing to do , and searching for a quality pattern is a good option,
better than surfing porn on the internet.
Adrie, (correct me if you don't agree)

2010/8/30 david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>

>
> It's so quiet here that I can hear crickets chirp.
>
> That's cool. I have work to do anyway.
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list