[MD] SQ is the illusion

[X Acto]

static quality is what we mean when we say we know stuff



----- Original Message ----
From: John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Sun, August 29, 2010 11:49:52 AM
Subject: [MD] SQ is the illusion

People talk about DQ like its so mysterious and ineffable, but really it's
SQ that's completely incomprehensible and mysterious.  Nothing is really
static, but it all seems like it is in the moment.  What's up with that?
Underlying substance is more unreal than real.  Patterns only exist in a
constantly shifting cosmos, with everything always in flux from moment to
moment.  Static?  What's static?

According to Magnus, the one and zeros of a machine.  The cold, rational
precision of logic.  That is, our own rational systems. But these are
unreal.  The real world pulls plugs, zaps with cosmic rays and turns to rust
in time.

Meanwhile, the ongoing Quality which causes us to create the world in our
heads, it's so plain and obvious and unchanging.  So unmysterious and
evident.

But everybody wants to believe that  SQ exists.  They want to feel that
reality is  stable.  Even though we know it's not.  What is it with you
people and your static cling?
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html