[MD] Is this the inadequacy of the MOQ?
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Thu Dec 2 02:04:04 PST 2010
Tim,
Okay weak.
Marsha
On Dec 2, 2010, at 4:26 AM, rapsncows at fastmail.fm wrote:
> Marsha,
> if this means you aren't going to reply to my last email, which I put
> some effort into: weak.
> Tim
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 03:07:50 -0500, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> said:
>>
>> Mark and Tim,
>>
>> You've gone off on conceptual expansions of your own dynamic
>> design, and I don't see any simple, convenient point on which to
>> agree or disagree. For me there is Quality(unpatterned experience/
>> patterned experience.)
>>
>> Have a good time.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Marsha
>>
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list