[MD] Is this the inadequacy of the MOQ?

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Thu Dec 2 02:04:04 PST 2010


Tim,  

Okay weak.


Marsha  



On Dec 2, 2010, at 4:26 AM, rapsncows at fastmail.fm wrote:

> Marsha,
> if this means you aren't going to reply to my last email, which I put
> some effort into: weak.
> Tim
> 
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 03:07:50 -0500, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> said:
>> 
>> Mark and Tim,
>> 
>> You've gone off on conceptual expansions of your own dynamic 
>> design, and I don't see any simple, convenient point on which to 
>> agree or disagree.  For me there is Quality(unpatterned experience/
>> patterned experience.)  
>> 
>> Have a good time.   
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers, 
>> Marsha  
>> 



 
___
 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list