[MD] spirituality

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Thu Dec 2 03:29:34 PST 2010


M:
     "The Buddhist view does not, however, exclude the possibility of the unfolding of the world.  Obviously the phenomena we all see around us aren't nonexistent, but if we examine _how_ they exist, then we soon see that they can't be viewed as a set of independent entities, each with its own existence.  Thus, phenomena exist only as a dream, an illusion or mirage.  Like mirror images, they can clearly be seen, but have no separate existence.  Nagarjuna, the great second-century Indian philosopher, said, "The nature of phenomena is that of mutual dependence; in themselves, phenomena are nothing at all."  Their evolution is neither random nor fixed by divine intervention.  Instead, they follow the laws of cause and effect in a global interdependence and reciprocal causality.  The problem of an "origin" comes about only from a belief in the absolute reality of phenomena and the existence of space and time.

     "In terms of absolute truth, there is no creation, no duration, and no end.  The paradox is a good illustration of the illusory nature of the world of phenomena.  It can reveal itself in an infinite number of ways because its final reality is emptiness.  In terms of the relative truth of appearances, we say that the conditioned world, called samsara, is "without beginning" because each state must have caused by the previous one.  So, with the Big Bank theory, do we have an _ex nihilo_ creation, a creation out of nothingness, or the expression of some kind of preexisting potential that is not yet manifested in the universe?  Is it seen as a real beginning, or as a stage in the universe's evolution?"   


'Mathieu Ricard & Trinh Xuan Thuan, 'The Quantum and the Lotus: A Journey to the Frontiers Where Science and Buddhism Meet',p.29)

 
___
 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list