[MD] spirituality

[Jan-Anders]

Hi Mark and Marsha

It was very long since I studied Einstein and Planck but I've always had 
the feeling that they were talking across each other.
E about the room, massa and energy "in rest" and P about the same in 
movement.
Michael Porter teached me how to make money of it.
Frank Zappa showed me how to laugh at it.

JA

moq_discuss-request at lists.moqtalk.org skrev 2010-12-03 11.37:
> Hi Marsha,
>
> Physics is interesting isn't it?  I love the metaphysical aspects.  I
> think (in my naivete) that constants such a Plank's are more a result
> of the math, than the reality (whatever that is).  These constants
> seem to fall out when we are equating things that are of different
> dimensional qualities.  But is interesting to know, that with the math
> of quantum theory we are only able to measure little itsy bitsy
> Planks.  There is also something about Cubits that is interesting, but
> I forget what now.  Anyway, Planks and Cubits.  One makes up the world
> and one saved humanity from the Great Flood.  Cool stuff.
>
> The rationality of these theories is still based on assumptions, which
> we make up.
>
> Mark
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:53 PM, MarshaV<valkyr at att.net>  wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >  Btw, this book contains excellent footnotes and glossary. ?From the glossary:
>> >
>> >  Planck's length: ..., it is the dimension at which space becomes a quantum foam and know physics break down. ?It is also the length of superstrings.
>> >
>> >  Planck's time: ..., it is the shortest time interval that can exist. ?Know physics break down for time intervals smaller than Planck's time.
>> >
>> >  ?(Mathieu Ricard&  Trinh Xuan Thuan, 'The Quantum and the Lotus: A Journey to the Frontiers Where Science and Buddhism Meet',p.300)
>> >
>> >  ---
>> >
>> >  Must get rid of those irrational and paradoxical answers...
>> >