[MD] Stuck on a Torn Slot

[John Carl]

Craig,

I'm not so much assuming DQ is the agency as I am assuming there is an
agency and calling it DQ.  Also, this agent instantiates differently,
depending on which level you're at.  From the perspective of an inorganic
pattern, life is magical and creative.  From the perspective of a society,
ideas are thus.  And since we don't comprehend any level beyond
intellectual, we call "DQ" that from which hypothesis magically appear.
Each higher level acts as a patterning agent to the levels below.

Is my simplistic understanding of all reality.

John

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:43 PM, <craigerb at comcast.net> wrote:

> [John]
> > dq is
> that-which-patterns...Some kind of agency is needed to explain how
> sensations become
> perceptions and
>  > molecules become chemistry professors.
>
> But why assume that DQ is that agency?  The human individual is the agent
> that explains how sensations become
> perceptions (see Ham, passim).  And molecules are the agents of life;
> living things the agents of chemistry
> departments.
> Craig
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>