[MD] Thus spoke Lila

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Sun Dec 5 10:47:41 PST 2010


Marsha:
Aren't those RMP's perceptions of Lila???   Are disagreeing with Lila and David Bohm?  Or what?   



On Dec 5, 2010, at 1:34 PM, david buchanan wrote:

> dmb:
> "Biologically she's fine, socially she's pretty far down the scale, intellectually she's nowhere.  But Dynamically . . . Ah! That's the one towatch." 	


On Dec 5, 2010, at 1:02 PM, MarshaV wrote:

>> Marsha:
>> I still think the best understanding of REALITY is found in Lila's
>> words(LILA, Chapter 14): "...I'm whatever your questions turn me into. You
>> don't see that. It's your questions that make me who I am. If you think I'm
>> an angel then that's what I am. If you think I'm a whore then that's what I
>> am. I'm whatever you think. And if you change your mind about me then I
>> change too. So whatever Richard tells you, it's true. There's no way he can
>> lie about me."    -    Reality is whatever you think it is (your patterns),
>> there's no way you can lie about it, and if you change your understanding of
>> reality, then reality changes too.
>> 
>> 
>> Here are something by David Bohm that says the same thing:
>> 
>> "Reality is what we take to be true.  What we take to be true is what we
>> believe.  What we believe is based upon our perceptions.  What we perceive
>> depends upon what we look for.  What we look for depends on what we think.
>> What we think depends on what we perceive.  What we perceive determines
>> what we believe.  What we believe determines what we take to be true.  What
>> we take to be true is our reality."
>> 
>>    (Mathieu Ricard & Trinh Xuan Thuan, 'The Quantum and the Lotus: A
>> Journey to the Frontiers Where Science and Buddhism Meet',p.121)
>> 
>> 




___





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list