[MD] Thus spoke Lila
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Sun Dec 5 10:47:41 PST 2010
Marsha:
Aren't those RMP's perceptions of Lila??? Are disagreeing with Lila and David Bohm? Or what?
On Dec 5, 2010, at 1:34 PM, david buchanan wrote:
> dmb:
> "Biologically she's fine, socially she's pretty far down the scale, intellectually she's nowhere. But Dynamically . . . Ah! That's the one towatch."
On Dec 5, 2010, at 1:02 PM, MarshaV wrote:
>> Marsha:
>> I still think the best understanding of REALITY is found in Lila's
>> words(LILA, Chapter 14): "...I'm whatever your questions turn me into. You
>> don't see that. It's your questions that make me who I am. If you think I'm
>> an angel then that's what I am. If you think I'm a whore then that's what I
>> am. I'm whatever you think. And if you change your mind about me then I
>> change too. So whatever Richard tells you, it's true. There's no way he can
>> lie about me." - Reality is whatever you think it is (your patterns),
>> there's no way you can lie about it, and if you change your understanding of
>> reality, then reality changes too.
>>
>>
>> Here are something by David Bohm that says the same thing:
>>
>> "Reality is what we take to be true. What we take to be true is what we
>> believe. What we believe is based upon our perceptions. What we perceive
>> depends upon what we look for. What we look for depends on what we think.
>> What we think depends on what we perceive. What we perceive determines
>> what we believe. What we believe determines what we take to be true. What
>> we take to be true is our reality."
>>
>> (Mathieu Ricard & Trinh Xuan Thuan, 'The Quantum and the Lotus: A
>> Journey to the Frontiers Where Science and Buddhism Meet',p.121)
>>
>>
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list