[MD] Thus spoke Lila
118
ununoctiums at gmail.com
Mon Dec 6 13:55:17 PST 2010
Hi Arlo, Platt,
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Arlo Bensinger <ajb102 at psu.edu> wrote:
> [Platt]
> "In order to climb outside the structure, one must first create a structure
> outside."
>
> Precisely why the MOQ structure must be outside its own intellectual level
> structure..
>
> Bo's SOL is right.
>
> [Arlo]
> Of course, then in order to look at that structure from the outside, you
> need something outside of that. And so on an so an so on....
>
> Talk about being stuck in SOL.
>
> Since according to Pirsig, everything is either DQ or SQ, is your MOQ a
> fifth-level of static patterns of value? Or some new non-DQ/non-SQ category?
[Mark]
I don't think we need to see it as an endless paradox. We can assume
both structures are looking at each other. This is a closed loop, as
I expressed in my original post on the space ship. This top down
approach is not necessary in MOQ in my opinion, it can be SSL (subject
subject), or OOL (object object). Of course it could also be OOOO LA
LA! That also has quality.
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list