[MD] Thus spoke Lila

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

Every collection of individuals is a group.
not every group is a collection of individuals.

Every Oak is a tree
not every tree is an Oak.

Every sunflower is a flower
Not every flower is a sunflower.

Every sailboat is a boat
Not every boat is a sailboat.

Bo is making a terrible mistake to take of on.

The individual in his model can be clustered together to form a group,
But it will not be a diversified groep, representing all different
individuals.

He is making a model for a group were each member sets of only on his own
isolated (intelligence) to form the group of intellectuals, it only looks
and feels as if it can be done.
He can , however ,only create a cluster of individuals, having the look and
feel of an intellectual level.
But each individu stands on his own, in fact., as a copy of the previous
individu.
Its a terrible mistake.

Try to see it like this.

a field of mushrooms, all the same in size and color, shape and presence.
Only one of the collection is poisonous, looking exactly like all the
others.

Bo is transponding all properties of that single mushroom to all others,they
are all the same , right? wrong, it only looks that way, and only some
properties
can match for the others, the poison will stay in the individual.

Intelligence serves the individual,and in a cluster , serves the group of
intellectuals, but only by multiplying all intelligence's, it serves the
intellectual properties of the group

But it is not the intellectual group, intellectual is more than the summary
of the group.




2010/12/6 Arlo Bensinger <ajb102 at psu.edu>

> [Platt]
>
> "In order to climb outside the structure, one must first create a structure
> outside."
>
> Precisely why the MOQ structure must be outside its own intellectual level
> structure..
>
> Bo's SOL  is right.
>
> [Arlo]
> Of course, then in order to look at that structure from the outside, you
> need something outside of that. And so on an so an so on....
>
> Talk about being stuck in SOL.
>
> Since according to Pirsig, everything is either DQ or SQ, is your MOQ a
> fifth-level of static patterns of value? Or some new non-DQ/non-SQ category?
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser