[MD] Thus spoke Lila

[118]

Hi Marsha,


On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:55 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2010, at 2:34 PM, 118 wrote:
>
>> Hi Marsha,
>> Can you appreciate the sun on your face without thinking there is sun
>> on your face?  I think you can.  You find it pleasing in an
>> intellectual way without any subject object.
>
> In a experiential way.  I don't need intellectual static patterns of value
> to enjoy the sun on my face.

[Mark]
OK, then we have a different appreciation for the intellectual level.
I am fine with that.  What I am saying is that the intellect is not
only static patterns of value, it is dynamic.  I think this is what I
stated earlier, but I now restate it.  If your definition of intellect
is the static pattern of value, then I see how you agree with Bo.  It
is just another way of looking at it.
>
>
>> If you want to place
>> this in another level, then you are not using your brain for such a
>> thing which seems hard to imagine (literally of course, you are always
>> using your brain in these posts).
>
> What?  Are you one of those who reduces all conceptual experiences
> to brain activity?

[Mark]
No, but the reflective appreciation would seem to be.  It would seem
that concepts are a brain thing, but maybe not.  I suppose the foot
can have concepts too, and so can a planet.  I was trying to stick
within a more defined framework.
>

>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>