[MD] Thus spoke Lila

[MarshaV]

On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Steven Peterson wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:30 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Steven Peterson wrote:
>> 
>>> Does Quality = Reality or does the MOQ = Reality?
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Steve,
>> 
>> For me it is both.  The MoQ as explained in LILA is
>> an intellectual pattern, and the MoQ designates
>> Reality = Quality.
>> 
>> Marsha
> 
> Steve:
> 
> You say it is both, but your explanation is a denial that it is both.
> You say that the MOQ is not reality, instead the MOQ designates that
> Quality = Reality. That is the difference that I was trying to get
> across. It is why there is no container logic problem. Reality
> contains the MOQ. The MOQ describes reality. It describes itself as
> part of reality and in particular part of the intellectual level.



Hi Steve,

1.)  The MoQ as explained in Lila is a set of intellectual patterns that 
present and explain the theory that Reality = Quality(DQ/sq). 

2.)  MoQ denotes Reality = Quality.  Quality as experienced.   

I don’t expect you to understand!   


Marsha 

 





 
___