[MD] Thus spoke Lila

[MarshaV]

Greetings Tim,

Sorry to be so unsociable .  I was on my way out the door, and typed 
a fast and not too friendly response.  

I admire Ham's accomplishment, and want to agree with him on 
some aspect of a proprietary self, but other than a convention 
built on assumptions, I just cannot agree.  


Marsha 





On Dec 10, 2010, at 11:57 AM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> On Dec 10, 2010, at 8:08 AM, rapsncows at fastmail.fm wrote:
> 
>> [Tim]
>> so, it seems we can get to: "The critical point, however, is that
>> conscious awareness (sensibility) and the intellect by which it
>> functions are proprietary to the individual self" without (recognizing)
>> a '..."uniform, unchanging, and limitless" Source' called 'essence'.  I
>> wonder if you could convince Marsha to incorporate 'proprietary' into
>> her definition of self?  I think so: '...interdependent, proprietary,
>> impermanent..."
> 
> 
> 
> Marsha:
> There seems to be a stream of interconnected bits and pieces of pattern, 
> but no underlying entity that represents a proprietor.  



 
___