[MD] Thus spoke Lila

[rapsncows at fastmail.fm]

Marsh,
very nice, tahnks
Tim

>  
> Hi Tim,
> 
> My position keeps going poof.  
> 
> I can adopt a hypothetical, unique, proprietary self for the sake of 
> Ham's Essence Metaphysics, but it does not hold together on 
> investigation.  Look, I am a static girl living in a static world; don't 
> see that there's a way around it.  That's the way the world has 
> evolved to function.  But upon investigation it all collapses.  Time, 
> space and self dissolve, and it is analogy/patterns all the way 
> down.  Even the Buddhists postulate a continuity of individual 
> consciousness on which is built karma, reincarnation and etc., but 
> it all seems to be built on assumptions.  It might be that I have not 
> developed the skills to experience an unbroken continuity, so the 
> best I can accept is Quality(unpatterned/patterned).  This is not a 
> denigration of static quality which always seem to have a 
> wondrous existence.
> 
> Yes the collection of patterns could seem "unique," but based on 
> what other than assumption?  Sooo, I don't know...  
> 
> 
> Marsha 
> 

[Tim]
This was really nice.  Again, thanks.

I don't know how much you were looking for a real answer to this
question about 'unique' and 'assumption', so I'll just say that I this
is why I have (and I think this is why John has too) come to
re-institute a word like faithe into my vocabulary.  Let me know if you
want more here.

But, I think that I have picked up on a pattern, not to say that it is
strict or anything, but I think you enjoy short responses aiming at one
highest quality point.  Therefore, my question here: you like that
'[your] position keeps going poof', don't you!?

Tim
-- 
  
  rapsncows at fastmail.fm

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Accessible with your email software
                          or over the web