[MD] Thus spoke Lila

[118]

Hi Platt, Horse,

I solve this problem by equating the mystical reality with the
spiritual reality.  In this way, MOQ can be bridged to many other
philosophies.

Mark

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Horse <horse at darkstar.uk.net> wrote:
> Hi Platt
>
> This worries me in that a simple phrase/verb such as "to know" should cause
> a problem in relation to what you have called the 'real' world of mystic
> reality. It makes me think that what you have said has no bearing on what
> you believe, in the sense that mystic reality is devoid of concepts and
> knowing is the creation of concepts.
> Knowledge of, knowledge about or knowledge that etc. X refers to something
> that can be known. The whole point of DQ/Mysticism in the MoQ sense is that
> it can only be experienced and not known.
> Or perhaps I've got it wrong. Anyone else agree or disagree?
>
> Horse
>
> On 13/12/2010 17:06, Platt Holden wrote:
>>
>> Hi Horse,
>>
>> Like many other things, we have a difference of opinion on what it means
>> "to
>> know." So I'll leave it at that.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Platt
>
> --
>
> "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
> deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
> — Frank Zappa
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>