[MD] Thus spoke Lila

[118]

Hi Tim,

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:28 AM,  <rapsncows at fastmail.fm> wrote:


> [Tim]
> In a post a few days ago I looked up Sidis' 'the animate and the
> inanimate'.  I gave it a quick read because I couldn't put it down.
> Then I looked back at something - I don't remember where I got turned on
> to it, I think it was here, someone provided a link maybe ...  Anyway, I
> ended up coming upon 'entropic gravity'.  Are you familiar with these?
> Any thoughts?
>

[Mark]
I have not read Sidis' book yet.  I looked for it in the library, but
was not surprised that they did not have it.  My memory of entropic
gravity was that it was a thermodynamic approach to describing
gravity.  This would be a systems approach describing gravity as a
result rather than as a creator.  I would imagine that the math is one
which postulates that gravity does not cause interaction, but is a
result of something else.

We come across many concepts like this.  It is like a coin having two
sides, one cannot exist without the other.  A similar notion is
whether we create or are created.  The synthesis of these are what I
consider the middle way.  Let's assume both and balance them.  Yin and
Yang, the ever-present act of balancing.  Things are not found in the
extremes.

Cheers,
Mark
> --
>

> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>