[MD] Philosophy and Abstraction

[MarshaV]

On Dec 18, 2010, at 2:32 PM, 118 wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> A comment below.
> 
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:54 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Ron,
>> 
>> DQ is is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.
>> Truth in my book is static patterns of value.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
> 
> [Mark]
> We are dividing up DQ all the time, so I am not sure if it is
> indivisible, that is what we do.  

Marsha:
I understand it more as patterns (sq) are overlaid onto DQ.


> [Mark]
> Unless we are not really doing that, then I would get kind of
> confused.  By my understanding of DQ, we Know it every
> moment of every day.  

Marsha:
I understand the process as stated above, patterns of value 
overlaid onto the unpatterened. 


> [Mark]
> So I wouldn't call it unknowable, unless you mean something
> different.  

Marsha:
I've explained what I mean too many times already.


> [Mark]
> Truth is not necessarily static.
> It could be considered as a seed which creates more truths.  Truth is
> dynamic, how's that for a truism?  How about, Value is a static
> pattern of Truth?  Since truth is beauty according to Keats, this
> would put value in the beauty camp.  Oh, so many ways to skin a cat...

Marsha:
Have a good time.  Follow your bliss...   

My exploration is ongoing.    


> Mark


Marsha 




 
___