[MD] All the way down

[MarshaV]

Hi Matt,

It sounds to me like Rorty is saying it is verbal designation all the 
all the way down, but isn't that be verbal designation built on
regularity and explanatory usefulness, as in pragmatically?   


Marsha




On Dec 19, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Matt Kundert wrote:

> 
> Oh, I get it: _IF_ DMB is even talking about the MoQ, who besides 
> Matt or Steve, etc., etc.
> 
> I thought you were sticking your racket in the court.  And I was 
> curious, because it would help discern the state of your thinking.  As 
> it is, I guess not, aside from "bored."
> 
> I get the feeling, Marsha, that you are bored by most of what can be 
> found in the MD.  Is there any kind of conversation you aren't bored 
> by?  (A question that should by no means imply that I find much here 
> to be exciting.)
> 
> Matt
> 
>> From: valkyr at att.net
>> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 04:40:04 -0500
>> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>> Subject: Re: [MD] All the way down
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 18, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Matt Kundert wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>>> "[DMB] It's about bringing all your faculties to bear and a deep
>>>> engagement with whatever you're doing. It is aimed at down to earth
>>>> stuff, which a lofty and worthy goal. It's also exceedingly sane,
>>>> because that's where we live; practical, everyday reality." --- very
>>>> nice.
>>> 
>>> Marsha said:
>>> If dmb is talking about the MoQ, who, besides Matt and Steve, will 
>>> disagree with this?  I take it that this attitude is what attracted us all 
>>> to the MoQ.  It is what ZMM and LILA is about.
>>> 
>>> Matt:
>>> Why would Matt or Steve disagree with that?
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> Or whatever issue of disagreement you, Steve and dmb are volleying 
>> back and forth.  Don't much care.  I haven't found either team's playing 
>> to have made the game worth the attention.   
>> 
>> 
>> ___

> 


 
___