[MD] All the way down

[Matt Kundert]

Not really.  I think it has something to do with assimilating 
"knowing-that" to "verbal abstractions" and than not conceiving of 
them as every bit of an outgrowth of DQ-direct-experience as an 
arm or sunset.

> Hi Matt,
> 
> Can you tell me what dmb's objection is?  
> 
> Marsha
> 
> On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Matt Kundert wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Absolutely.  In Brandom's systematic expansion of the core ideas of 
> > Sellars and Rorty, propositional knowing-that is built out of 
> > pragmatic know-how.
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> >> Hi Matt,
> >> 
> >> It sounds to me like Rorty is saying it is verbal designation all the 
> >> all the way down, but isn't that be verbal designation built on
> >> regularity and explanatory usefulness, as in pragmatically?   
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Marsha