[MD] "knowing that" versus "knowing how"

[Jan-Anders]

Marsha

Without bad quality there will be no need for good quality. Bad taste is 
the ultimate well of proper sense. Need is the Mother of Invention. As I 
now have found a working definition for good quality I will aim my 
torchlight into the deep sources of need for a better behaviour and will 
start my investigations in my own poor appearance in this dark world of 
unenlightment and ugly radio channels. Please Support Zappa Radio! 
http://www.zappa.com/zapparadio/ :-)

An absolute good quality is a perishable event related to some other 
event of Dynamic Quality. I think it's very well defined in Lila ch. 
11-12.. The Value of an absolute good quality is 1, a perfect division 
between the dynamic quality and the static (ultimate) quality, in three 
dimensions of the event, it's real amount, it's pattern and it's useful 
expression.

The example http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVtw-en2H5U (now available on 
Youtube) is a short little movie with an OK content but it has got the 
wrong angle and I don't know how to rotate a film clip so the pattern of 
it is a little bit "disqualified" which makes the total quality less than 1.

Got it?

Jan-Anders



moq_discuss-request at lists.moqtalk.org skrev 2010-12-26 21.04:
> Are you talking of an absolute "good quality" or something other?  Sorry, I am not a member of facebook so don't have access to the video.  Maybe you can explain what you mean.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 26, 2010, at 4:21 AM, Jan-Anders wrote:
>
>> >  Hi Adrie and Marsha
>> >  
>> >  This is an example of how something can have good quality in content but still the presentation is messed up by the form of it.
>> >  
>> >  http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=493477069259
>> >  
>> >  An iPad would probably give it a higher quality as the total quality is composed by both the content and how it is presented.
>> >  
>> >  JA