[MD] Intellectual Level

[Ian Glendinning]

No Platt, I'm a cup half full person.

It demonstrates the completeness of intellect (if allowed to address
its own cracks) rather than limiting it.
They are a freedom of intellect, a room for manouevre, rather than a
limitation. (if you choose to look at it that way.)

Ian

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Platt Holden <plattholden at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Excellent point. Demonstrates limits of intellect and frees one to seek
> truth between the cracks of static patterns. Or, as Ayn Rand counseled,
> "Check you premises."
>
> Platt
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Ian Glendinning
> <ian.glendinning at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Platt & Craig, both criticising contradiction ... fail to see its quality.
>>
>> Intellect defining intellect = good news for the enlightenment of
>> intellect (clue, a process).
>> Intuititive and invisible = good.
>>
>> Unless you're looking for disagreement, of course.
>> Ian
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 6:03 PM,  <craigerb at comcast.net> wrote:
>> > [Platt]
>> >> The SOM premise is self-evident and thus invisible to the
>> >> intellectual level of patterns.
>> >
>> > I don't think this is possible. "Self-evident" means "easily seen"
>> > & "invisible" means "cannot be seen". They are contradictory.
>> > Craig
>> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> > Archives:
>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> >
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>