[MD] to claim people had no "intellect"

[David Thomas]

On 2/4/10 10:25 PM, "Ian MacLean" <imm at stylenouveau.com> wrote:

> I'm sorry, but I can't make heads or tails out of this sentence.  Care to
> proofread it, and try again?
No 
>> ...Then at the end of the day when developing the MoQ that he [Pirsig] would
>> place the very approach he criticizes, SOM
>> science, as the sole source intellectual knowledge just doesn't make sense.

You don't understand this sentence yet write several screens full of
response to it. 

I suggest you go to the archives and read the "Intellect's Symposium" start
to finish then you might understand the context of this sentence and
conversation that has been going on for several months.

>  have no doubt that the genius(es) who built Stonehenge qualify, as would
> geniuses from the Native American population who had no way to record their
> thoughts. 

Did these geniuses have intellects? (the power and capacity for knowledge
and reason)

Dave