[MD] Media As Epistemology and what it means for Truth
francisco albano
pacoalbano3 at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 10 04:59:44 PST 2010
May Yahweh bless you and keep you!
May Yahweh let his face shine on you, and be gracious to you!
May Yahweh look kindly on you, and give you his peace! (Num. 6:24-26)
--- On Wed, 2/10/10, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:
From: david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MD] Media As Epistemology and what it means for Truth
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 10:58 AM
Okay, if the medium is the message and I consume radio, television, magazines, newspapers, and books through the internet then what's the message? Does a stupid thing suddenly become brilliant when it takes a different shape or vice versa? I'm not entirely kidding. The borders between the various media are getting blurrier every day and personally the medium doesn't matter to me. It's like a window. I don't look at it so much as through it. Or a drink. It's nice to have a proper glass but as long as it's clean who cares what kind of cup it is? I don't know scholars make a big deal out of such things but I just don't see it. I don't think it's a crazy idea or anything but it does seem a bit overplayed and out of proportion. This is essentially a Marxist idea, by the way. This basic notion that the material means of production will always determine the shape of culture is a common assumption among Marxist cultural critics. That assumption or premise
practically defines what a Marxist critic is. I don't know what Postman's background is but it sure wouldn't surprise.
There's my 2.0 cents.
>> From Paco:
I think the Marxist tenet is this: The economic base, also called relations of production or property relations, determines superstructurality of elements of culture and politics that it wants for itself, to justify/legitimize it. It does not determine the whole of culture and politics. It is superstructural culture and politics on the base. The base is not the forces of production. Forces of production as base is revisionism (thus, China, for example). Thus there will be elements of culture that are against the given relations of production. Capitalist relations of production do not determine socialist culture. Socialist culture exposes and opposes low quality capitalist economic base or relations of production.
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list