[MD] The damned long-liners

[skutvik at online.no]

DMB

On 13 Feb. you wrote:

> Maybe it would be more convenient for you to simply delete my
> contributions without trying to read them. They never had any effect
> anyway, so what's the difference? That would be okay with me. I'm not
> at all interested in debating your SOLAQI but it is the ONLY thing
> that interest you. Since we have nothing to talk about, why bother?

That would be a solution hadn't it been for you contaminating other 
people's posts so when they reply the long-line illness spreads to the 
whole site. It must be my aesthetic sense that reacts so violently to 
the mess. Regarding not debating with me I fully understand that, I 
apply the MOQ's true, strong interpretation while you have shied 
away from it ever since your Paul Turner "conversion", and  the weak 
interpretation is just what it says. To avoid the inevitable 
consequences of Pirsig's ideas you have to do weird logical 
maneuvers and/or make it so impenetrable that no one understands a 
thing, like P.T.'s blog or Matt Kundert's who in addition must make 
statements about NOT meaning what his essay says. What a sorry 
state. About the SOL interpretation the only thing that interests me - 
you bet - because it IS the MOQ and you see how it is required for the 
MOQ to have any relevance at all, for instance the pending Islam vs 
West conflict.    

Bodvar