[MD] The MoQ can't be atheistic
Ian Glendinning
ian.glendinning at gmail.com
Mon Feb 15 00:15:05 PST 2010
John said,
"Between the angry bull horn of the religiously certain, and the angry bull
horn of the anti-religiously certain, we have the middle way of the MoQ -
which says Good is real but cannot be defined."
And later
"And I don't think the MoQ should be pushing religion, I also don't
think it should be pushing anti-religion."
Agreed.
Picking up on one phrase - to link to DMB's other current argument ...
"Good is real but cannot be defined."
What is defined in the MoQ is the process by which good is bettered -
evolving hierarchical patterns (species) of good. But "good " itself
is unatainable - a mystical dream.
Regards
Ian
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list