[MD] Mao & The MoQ
Mary
marysonthego at gmail.com
Sun Feb 21 14:05:37 PST 2010
> Mary:
>
> SOL = subject-object logic.
> SOM = subject-object metaphysics.
>
> My dog uses SOL but will never study SOM.
>
> SOL is the tool and SOM is the interpretation. Looked at this way, the
> door
> is still open for some other interpretation to supplant SOM. IMO, all
> Western metaphysics is some variation on SOM.
>
>
>
> SOL, on the other hand, is the underlying mechanism of brain function
> that
> developed in the Biological Level which separates us from each other
> and
> from everything else. It is fundamental to all thinking species and
> requires extreme effort and practice to overcome - to the extent that
> it can
> be overcome at all.
>
> Ron:
> If SOL is the underlying mechanism of brain function that developed the
> biological level, why on earth would we seek to reform a subject /
> object
> metaphysics?
>
[Mary Replies]
Gee Ron, I thought we were here discussing the MoQ? Doesn't the MoQ kind of
point out the weaknesses of S/O metaphysics? Maybe what was developed in
the Biological Level is not the BEST way to view reality? Geez, man, if you
are going to argue about this, then go find a Kantian discuss list maybe?
Thanks,
Mary
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list