[MD] Mao & The MoQ

Mary marysonthego at gmail.com
Sun Feb 21 14:05:37 PST 2010


> Mary:
> 
> SOL = subject-object logic.
> SOM = subject-object metaphysics.
> 
> My dog uses SOL but will never study SOM.
> 
> SOL is the tool and SOM is the interpretation.  Looked at this way, the
> door
> is still open for some other interpretation to supplant SOM.  IMO, all
> Western metaphysics is some variation on SOM.
> 
> 
> 
> SOL, on the other hand, is the underlying mechanism of brain function
> that
> developed in the Biological Level which separates us from each other
> and
> from everything else.  It is fundamental to all thinking species and
> requires extreme effort and practice to overcome - to the extent that
> it can
> be overcome at all.
> 
> Ron:
> If SOL is the underlying mechanism of brain function that developed the
> biological level, why on earth would we seek to reform a subject /
> object
> metaphysics?
> 
[Mary Replies] 
Gee Ron, I thought we were here discussing the MoQ?  Doesn't the MoQ kind of
point out the weaknesses of S/O metaphysics?  Maybe what was developed in
the Biological Level is not the BEST way to view reality?  Geez, man, if you
are going to argue about this, then go find a Kantian discuss list maybe?

Thanks,
Mary




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list