[MD] The Intellectual Level of Quality, according to Mark

[John Carl]

Sorry for the delay, Craig.  New job.  Real hours.  Many posts to read.

S/O is good, not SOM is good.  I should have said.  Subject Object
perception is a useful and fun tool.  It's not the basis of being.  Cast it
away as the basis of being, but don't cast it away as a good and useful
tool, is the point I think I remember I was making, but the big "M" is a
dirty trouble-maker.  I think it even tripped Ron up somewhere in a recent
post of his I skimmed through trying to catch up.  It stuck in my brain and
now I'll have to look for it.

J

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:54 PM, <craigerb at comcast.net> wrote:

>
>
> [John]
> > This is the problem so many here have and have had in
> > declaiming the subject/object relationship as non-fundamental and they
> end
> > up proclaiming it as non-existent!
> > SOM - is Good
>
> If you're saying the subject/object relationship is non-fundamental,
> why are you saying "SOM - is Good"?
> Craig
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>