[MD] Redressing the MoQ

David Thomas combinedefforts at earthlink.net
Sat Feb 27 11:29:46 PST 2010


On 2/27/10 5:52 AM, "Magnus Berg" <McMagnus at home.se> wrote:

> From what I read on his site, he hasn't bothered to investigate much of what
> *is* metaphysically fundamental. His aims seems to be very disconnected from
> any metaphysical reality, so I guess he really don't care.

Oh he makes metaphysical claims he just does them individually, narrowly,
and very judicially. Not as a system. In his work all metaphysical claims
are untestable and usually underlie all testable claims in some way or
another but usually are not clearly stated.

For example, he says that underlying all of physics is the unstated
metaphysical assumption:

The universe is comprehensible.

The sun is shining, it warm for the first time in weeks I'm out of here.

Dave





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list