[MD] The Mythos-Logos issue.
plattholden at gmail.com
plattholden at gmail.com
Thu Jul 1 09:18:41 PDT 2010
On 1 Jul 2010 at 10:05, Arlo Bensinger wrote:
> [Platt]
> Oh, oh. The spectre of censorship arises. Now the arbiters of "the
> truth" threaten. Does your warning to sentence Bo to Siberia also
> apply to me, Mary, Marsha and others who are at least willing to
> entertain the idea that the Pirsig may be wrong?
>
> [Arlo]
> I'm guessing you didn't even read Horse's post, or you're trying to
> do your typical distortion bullshit.
>
> This has NOTHING to do with thinking Pirsig is wrong. I think Pirsig
> is wrong about a few things. That is a VALID argumentative position
> to hold. Say Pirsig is wrong, say Bo is right. No harm, no foul.
>
> The issue, as Horse clearly points out, is in the dishonesty that
> Bo's ideas are somehow Pirsig's ideas. They are NOT.
>
> You say "other who are at least willing to entertain the idea that
> the Pirsig may be wrong"... GREAT! Entertain away! I do.
>
> But that is not the issue. As Horse (and Ian, and others) make plain.
[Platt]
A distinction without a difference as far as the issue of censorship is
concerned. Much evidence has been presented that Bo's ideas are indeed the same
as Pirsig's.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list