[MD] Bo

[X Acto]

Bodvar:

 It' more than plain that the emergence of SOM is the ditto of 
the intellectual level, and no one really have any arguments against it 
the only straw left is that "Pirsig hasn't vouched for it".  

Ron:
How does SOL provide greater explanitory power? until you explain
this, SOL is dead. You have yet to address this arguement and quite a few
others.   

Nom de Mary:
> Since he cannot let go of his creation, I see two choices for him as
> dictated by the source of this site, Robert M. Pirsig.  He can either
> write his own metaphysics or pursue enlightenment.  By enlightenment I
> mean a form of insanity.  My hope is that he will write his
> metaphysics.  Frankly, as I understand it, enlightenment is small.  It
> is the spark that lights the fire.  If he needs to crib or borrow from
> Pirsig, I don't see how anyone here can object given that the
> metaphysics of quality is dynamic.

Bodvar:
My creation? No way. The MOQ as presented in LILA alternates 
between the true SOL interpretation and the one that no-one knows 
what is or can be used for. 

Ron:   
MoQ is the expansion of rationality. By making value the center of reality
Not objective matter. It enables us to make distinctions based on preferences.
By Intellectual Good, not intellectual truth. Intellectual Good rationally follows
inorganic, organic and social Good and rationally supports those Goods.
It allows us to intellectually justify value because it is more empirical than 
objective truth. MoQ makes truth subordinate to the Good.
Doing so allows us to prefer the best intellectual explainations on the basis
of their value, inorganic, organic and social good not their correspondance to 
an objective  cold valueless physical reality.

Now, would you kindly explain what SOL is and what it is used for.