[MD] Decision

[Mary]

Hi X acto,

> [X acto]
> One side justifys their beliefs by rejecting half of Pirsigs work
> 
> the other justifys their beliefs by the inclusion,and consistentcy
> of all of Pirsigs work.
> 
> They are able to give explanations for why they value this
> interpretation
> 
> while the other can not give an explanation outside the interpretive
> factor.
> 
> one is narrow and exclusive the other broad and inclusive.
> 
> one side is a better explanation than the other.
> 
> To begin the dialog, lets ask.
> 

[Mary replies]

A dialog is a conversation undertaken with some level of mutual respect.
Perhaps someone else can engage with you, but I'm not comfortable that this
is a dialog.

Best,
Mary