[MD] The strong interpretation of the MOQ (SIM)

[Ian Glendinning]

Hi Marsha, inserted ...

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:56 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Based on my experience and conventional understanding, and ignoring
> the bottom line 'not this, not that interpretation of ultimate truth,' here is my
> individual interpretation of intellectual patterns:
>
>
> Intellectual Static Patterns of Value are reified concepts and the rules
> for their rational analysis and manipulation.

Ian - Yes, static / reified long enough for such manipulation and
analysis to take place.

> Intellectual patterns create
> false boundaries, create a division between the observed and the
> observer giving the illusion of independence, or 'thingness'.

Ian - Kinda yes. Typically yes, in a Good-Old-Fashioned SOMist
intellectual world, but not fundamentally, in an MoQ world.

The fourth
> level is a formalized subject/object level where the subjective is
> supposedly stripped from the experience.

Ian - Kinda yes, but "supposedly" is a key word. Supposed only by
SOMists. We can (with our intellects and empirical experience) chose
to slice and dice, analyse and manipulate the world in ways that
represent the world in any other way we MoQists chose recognize many
more useful appropriate patterns of value before S or O.

>
>
> My mind is definitely subject to change.  For instance, next month I may
> decide the fourth level should be understood as the 'crossword level.'

Ian - OK :-)

>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>