[MD] Intellectual honesty

[John Carl]

dmb,

 Childish?  Sure, gleefully so.
Incoherent?  Coherence is dependent upon the hearer.
Insults without substance?  Insults without substance are easily shrugged
off.

Seems to me the real issue is you don't even know where to begin.

Try a brick.


If that's too difficult for your academically-oriented brain, then focus on
the one true question I've been asking, how do you reconcile Pirsig's
enthusiasm for Bradley with James'  denigration of  him?

Good luck.


On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:48 AM, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>wrote:

>
> John:
>
> See, this is why I'm not interested. First you try to "invite" me with
> insults. Then you tell me to get off my "high-horse" while also saying you
> agree with the "moral high ground". To cap it off, you make some vague
> accusation of intellectual dishonesty and hypocrisy.
>
>
> You're being childish, incoherent and your insults are without substance.
> Plus I find it very hard to believe that you even understand your beloved
> Absolute Idealism, which is a dead philosophy.
>
>
> Why in the world would I be interested in having THAT conversation? Sorry,
> but I think it would be a pointless waste of time.
>
>
>
>