[MD] LC Comments

[Joseph Maurer]

On 7/10/10 4:09 PM, "Magnus Berg" <McMagnus at home.se> wrote:

<snip>
> Do you really think the MoQ can make an impact in the scientific
> community with four levels that "doesn't really reflect reality, we're
> just guessing every time we want to analyse a thing"? Shouldn't that
> *be* the aim? To make such an impact? I remember it was in the beginning
> of the Lila Squad, but it doesn't seem to be that anymore.
<snip>
 
Hi Magnus and all,
 
I have no idea if the scientific community recognizes a metaphysical
explanation for evolution.  The scientific community depends heavily on
mathematical logic.  Imho evolution is not conceptualized in the SQ logic of
mathematics. In MOQ there is a difference in the logic for 1 in evolution DQ
and the logic for 1 in mathematics SQ.    Mathematical logic starts with
defined 1 SQ.  Evolution is the description of a hierarchy in undefined 1
DQ. 
 
Evolution describes a hierarchy in the evolution of DQ. In three levels
described in esoteric literature, the emotional, higher emotional, and
higher intellectual levels, there is no SQ.  SQ definitions at the other 4
levels inorganic, organic1, organic2 and intellectual flesh out the
metaphysics DQ/SQ, a hierarchy in existence.

The intellectual level in consciousness uses a defined logic 1, 2, 3.  There
is a hierarchy in undefined quality DQ 1,1,1 between the emotional, higher
emotional, higher intellectual levels.  The undefined discreteness DQ in
each level creates the hierarchy in existence, evolution.  This hierarchy
describes metaphysical logic.   Mathematics is SQ logic and cannot describe
some levels in DQ logic, evolution, in which the 1 remains undefined.  SQ
logic defines 1 in 4 levels in evolution. The DQ 1 in three levels is
undefined (the border between levels of evolution) and outside of
mathematical SQ logic (defined borders).
 
Joe